The Literature Review (LR) section is an integral part of a research article (RA) where the author needs to develop a theoretical groundwork to anchor his/her own study. However, the part-genre always eludes novice writers, which involves deciding what to cite from relevant past literature and what goals the cited knowledge serves therein. Insights are thus necessary into how experienced/expert writers address such issues. Unfortunately, there has been a dearth of research into this topic, with existing work focusing mainly on the formal features and generic functions of source use. Motivated by the missing gap and the pedagogical need and grounded in Swales’s (1990) CARS model and Kwan and Chan’s (2014) semantic typology of citations, the present study is an attempt to examine the semantic attributes of source ideas that get cited in different parts of the LR sections of Information Systems RAs following a behavioral science research (BSR) paradigm. Findings reveal that distinct types of source ideas are cited, which are associated with the specific move-steps of the LR sections and the BSR paradigm. A comparison of some of the cited ideas with the original ideas from the source texts also demonstrates that the latter have been re-contextualized to varying degrees to advance the arguments that the writers make in their LRs. Taken together, the study’s outcomes suggest that using a move-specific approach to citations can yield useful insights into source use in LRs. Implications for citation teaching and future citation research will be drawn.
Association for Information Systems (2011, Dec 6). Senior Scholars' Basket of Journals. https://aisnet.org/page/SeniorScholarBasket.
Avgerou, C. & Cornford, T. (1993). Developing information systems: concepts, issues and practice. Information systems series. Palgrave Macmillan.
Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90022-1
Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bruce, I. (2014). Expressing criticality in the literature review in research article introduction in applied linguistics and psychology. English for Specific Purposes, 36, 85 – 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.004
Buckingham, J. & Neville, M. (1997). A model of citation options. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 51 – 66. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.20.2.04buc
Cavaye, A. L. M. (1996). Case study research: A multi-faceted research approach for IS, Information Systems Journal, 6, 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.1996.tb00015.x
Charles, M. (2006). Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 310 – 331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.003
Chen, X. & Li, M. (2019). Chinese learner writers’ niche establishment in the literature review chapter of theses: a diachronic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 48 – 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.03.006
Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for academic purposes, 12(1), 33 – 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002
Crookes, G. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7, 57 – 70. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/7.1.57
del Saz Rubio, M. M. (2011). A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of agricultural sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 30, 258 – 271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.002
Dong, Y. (1996). Learning how to use citations for knowledge transformation: Nonnative doctoral students’ dissertation writing in science. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 428 – 457. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171551
Efron, S. E. & Ravid, R. (2019). Writing the literature review: A practical guide. The Guilford Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Fazel, I. & Shi, L. (2015). Citation behaviors of graduate students in grant proposal writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 203 – 214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.002
Feak, C. B. & Swales, J. M. (2009). Telling a research story: Writing a literature review. University of Michigan Press.
Fitzpatrick, J. J. & Kazer, M. W. (2006). Encyclopedia of nursing research. Springer Publication.
Fløttum, K., Dahl, T., & Kinn, T. (2006). Academic voices: Across languages and disciplines. John Benjamins Publishing.
Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 113 – 122. https://www.jstor.org/stable/284636
Gil-Salom, L. & Soler-Monreal, C. (2014). Writers’ positioning in literature reviews in English and Spanish computing doctoral theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 23 – 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.08.002
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage Publications.
Harwood, N. (2009). An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(3), 497 – 518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001
Harwood, N. & Petric, B. (2012). Performance in the citing behavior of two student writers. Written Communication, 29, 55-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311424133
Hevner, A. R. (2007). A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian journal of information systems, 19(2), 1 – 7. https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol19/iss2/4
Hewings, A., Lilis, T., & Vladimirous, D. (2010). Who’s citing whose writings? A corpus-based study of citations as interpersonal resource in English medium national and English medium international journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 102 – 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.005
Hinkel, E. (1997). The past tense and temporal verb meanings in a contextual
frame. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588048
Hopkins, A. & Dudley-Evans, A. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7, 113 – 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(88)90029-4
Hu, G. & Wang, G. (2014). Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 14 – 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001
Huang, C. D., Goo, J, N. K., & Yoo, C. W. (2017). Smart tourism technologies in travel planning: The role of exploration and exploitation. Information and Management, 54(6), 757 – 770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.11.010
Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341 – 267. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing. Longman Pearson Education.
Hyland, K. (2002). Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 115 – 130). Pearson Education Limited.
Jaccard, J. & Jacoby, J. (2010). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. Guilford Press.
Jalilifar, A. (2012). Academic attribution: Citation analysis in master’s theses and research articles in applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 24 – 41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2011.00291.x
Jung, Y. & Pawlowski, S. D. (2014). Virtual goods, real goods: Exploring means-end goal structures of consumers in social virtual worlds. Information & Management, 51(5), 520 – 531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.03.002
Kamler, B. & Thomson, P. (2006). Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for Supervision. Routledge.
Klein, H. K. & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 67 – 93. https://doi.org/10.2307/249410
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. University Chicago Press.
Kwan, S. C. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 30-55.
Kwan, S. C. (2017). A cross-paradigm macrostructure analysis of research articles in Information Systems. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 14-30.
Kwan, S. C., & Chan, H. (2014). An investigation of source use in the results and the closing sections of empirical articles in Information Systems: In search of a functional-semantic citation typology mfor pedagogical purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 29-47.
Kwan, S. C., Chan, H., & Lam, C. (2012). Evaluating prior scholarship in literature reviews of research articles: A comparative study of practices in two research paradigms. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 188-201.
Lee, A. S. (1989). Case studies as natural experiments. Human Relations, 42(2), 117 – 137. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678904200202
Lee, J. J., Hitchcock, C., & Casai, J. E. (2018). Citation practices of L2 university students in first-year writing: Form, function, and stance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 1 - 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.01.001
Lester, J. D. & Lester, J. D. (2012). Writing research papers: A complete guide. Pearson Education Limited.
Li, Q. & Zhang, X. (2021). An analysis of citations in Chinese English-major master’s theses and doctoral dissertations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 1 – 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100982
Linell, P. (1998a). Approaching Dialogue. IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society. John Benjamins.
Linell, P. (1998b). Discourse across boundaries: On re-contextualizations and the blending of voices in Professional discourse. Text, 18(2), 144 – 157. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.19126.96.36.199
Liu, M., Hull, C. E., & Hung, Y-T. C. (2016). Starting open source collaborative innovation: the antecedents of network formation in community source. Information Systems Journal, 27, 643 – 670. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12113
Mansourizadeh, K. & Ahmad, U. K. (2011). Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 152 –161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.004
March, S. T. & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15, 251 – 266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2
Meth, H., Mueller, B., & Maedche, A. (2015). Designing a requirement mining system. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(9), 799 – 837. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol16/iss9/2
Murray, N. (2008). Writing up your university assignments and research projects: A practical handbook. McGraw-Hill Education.
Nesi, H. (2021). Sources for courses: metadiscourse and the role of citation in student writing. Lingua, 253, Article 103040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103040
Paltridge, B. & Starfield, S. (2020). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language. Routledge.
Peng, J-E. (2019). Authorial voice constructed in citation in literature reviews of doctoral theses: Variations across training contexts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 11 – 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.001
Petric, B. (2007). Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 238 – 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.002
Petric, B. & Harwood, N. (2013). Task requirements, task representation and citation functions: An interview-based study of the citing behavior of a successful L2 student writer. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 110 – 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.01.002
Putzke, J., Fischbach, K., Schoder, D., & Gloor, P. A. (2010). The evolution of interaction networks in massively multiplayer online games. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11, 69 – 94. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol11/iss2/2
Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. Sage Publications.
Rudestam, K. E. & Newton, R. R. (Eds.) (2007). Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process Sage Publications.
Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00023-5
Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introduction. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.005
Samraj, B. (2013). Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master's theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 299 – 310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.09.001
Shih, H-P., Lai, K-H., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2017). Constraint-based and dedicated-based mechanisms for encouraging online self-disclosure: Is personalization the only thing that matters? European Journal of Information Systems, 26, 432 – 450. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-016-0031-0
Shoemaker, P. J., Tankard, J., & Lasorsa, D. L. (2004). How to build social science theories. Sage Publications.
Soler-Monreal, C. (2016). A Move-Step Analysis of the Concluding Chapters in Computer Science PhD Theses. Iberica, 32, 105-132. https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/175
Soler Monreal, C. & Gil Salom, L. (2011). A cross-language study on citation practice in PhD theses. International Journal of English Studies, 11(2), 53 – 75. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2011/2/149641
Soper, D. S., Demirkan, H., Goul, M., & St. Louis, R. (2012). An empirical examination of the impact of ICT investments on future levels of institutionalized democracy and foreign direct investment in emerging societies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(3), 116 – 149. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol13/iss3/3
Sutton, R. & Staw, B. (1995). What Theory is Not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371 – 384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393788
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. University of Michigan Press.
Swales, J. & Lindermann, S. (2002). Teaching the literature review to international graduate students’. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 105 – 119). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tadros, A. (1993). The pragmatics of text averral and attribution in academic texts. Data, description, discourse, 98 – 114.
Thomas, S. & Hawes, T. P. (1994). Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for specific purposes, 13(2), 129 – 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90012-4
Thompson, P. (2005). Points of focus and position: intertextual reference in PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 307 – 323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.006
Thompson, P. & Tribble, C. (2001). Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning and Technology, 5, 91 – 105. http://IIt.msu.edu/vol5num3/thompson/
Thompson, G. & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12, 305 – 382. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.365
Xie, J. (2016). Direct or indirect? Critical or uncritical? Evaluation in Chinese English-major MA thesis literature reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.001
Copyright (c) 2022 Hon Tung Chan, Siu Chu Kwan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.